A register built once
The record of processing was written for the deadline and has not tracked new products, vendors or data fields since. Auditors test it against live systems.
Privacy compliance service
Limaz builds the data inventories, governance, rights and DPIA workflows, vendor controls, retention rules, and technical measures required to run a PDPL compliance program.
Organizations must know whether they determine purposes and means (controller) or process on behalf of another party (processor). That distinction drives contracts, inventories, and operational duties.
Banks, fintechs, healthcare providers, and employers often act as controllers for customer or employee data and as processors for partners. The operating model has to name both roles where they exist.
Record personal data, purposes, systems, sharing, and Arabic records.
Who decides, who executes rights requests, who handles vendors, who owns incidents.
Consent, access and deletion requests, DPIA, and breach paths that staff can actually run.
Handling rules and labeling so privacy policy matches how data moves.
Access, retention, deletion, vendor constraints, and evidence in the systems that hold the data.
Training and operating routines so the program does not die after the project.
The PDPL and its Implementing Regulations set the rules. The clock starts when you become aware of the incident, not when the investigation ends.
Record the date and time of the incident and of its discovery. Leaks, loss, destruction and unlawful access to personal data all count.
Decide whether the incident causes or could cause harm to the data or to the data subject, or conflicts with their rights or interests. If it does, notification is mandatory.
File through the National Data Governance Platform. Include a description of the incident, the categories and approximate number of people and records affected, the risks, the measures taken, whether data subjects were told, and contact details for the controller or DPO.
If some facts are missing at 72 hours, file what you have and send the rest as soon as possible, with the reason for the delay.
Notify data subjects without undue delay, in simple and clear language, whenever the breach could harm them or their rights.
Keep copies of every notification and record the corrective measures. Run this alongside your SAMA and NCA incident reporting so one incident produces one consistent set of notices.
The PDPL allows transfers outside the Kingdom for defined purposes: an international agreement the Kingdom is party to, the Kingdom's interests, an obligation to the data subject, or other purposes set in the regulations. Every transfer must not harm national security or the Kingdom's vital interests, must go to a destination with adequate protection, and must be limited to the minimum data needed.
The Regulation on Personal Data Transfer outside the Kingdom (version 2.0, August 2024) gives the mechanics. SDAIA publishes the list of countries and international organisations it considers adequate. Where a destination is not on that list, you rely on appropriate safeguards: SDAIA's standard contractual clauses, binding common rules for a multinational group, or a certificate from an entity SDAIA has licensed.
A written transfer risk assessment is mandatory in two cases: when you rely on those safeguards, and when you transfer sensitive data outside the Kingdom on a continuous or large-scale basis. It covers the legal basis, the scope of the transfer, the adequacy of the safeguards, data minimisation, possible harms and the controls that reduce them. If the safeguards stop working, or SDAIA finds them inadequate, you halt the transfer.
For a bank or fintech, the usual flows are cloud and SaaS platforms, card schemes and processors, group reporting, offshore support, and fraud or screening services. Each one needs a named mechanism, a signed contract and, where required, a risk assessment on file before the data moves.
The record of processing was written for the deadline and has not tracked new products, vendors or data fields since. Auditors test it against live systems.
Teams label processing as legitimate interest without the written balancing test, or apply it to sensitive data, which the regulations forbid.
Access and correction requests land in a shared mailbox with no clock, so nobody can prove the 30-day deadline was met.
Cloud regions, SaaS tools and group systems move data abroad with no recorded mechanism or risk assessment.
The retention policy exists, but core systems and backups keep everything forever. Auditors want destruction evidence from the systems themselves.
Fraud and AML platforms such as Naiza combine identity, transaction, device and screening signals, which is exactly the dataset matching that triggers a DPIA. Limaz documents it once, with the controls built in.
This is how Limaz runs a PDPL programme for a bank or fintech. Each phase ends with evidence you can hand to SDAIA or an internal auditor.
Confirm your controller and processor roles, registration status and DPO requirement. Name the accountable owners in business, technology, legal and risk.
Map each product and system: data, purpose, lawful basis, recipients, retention and transfers. Flag sensitive and credit data.
Fix consent capture and withdrawal, write legitimate interest assessments, and align the privacy policy and channel notices with real processing.
Build the request workflow with the 30-day clock and the 72-hour breach runbook, then test both with a tabletop exercise.
Complete the mandatory DPIAs, update processor contracts, and put a mechanism and risk assessment behind every transfer outside the Kingdom.
Implement retention and destruction in the systems, assemble the evidence pack, train the teams and hand over a run calendar the DPO owns.
The PDPL sets the principles. The Implementing Regulations set the deadlines, triggers and records that SDAIA checks. This guide covers the parts companies most often get wrong.
Cloud, SaaS and group reporting all move personal data abroad. The Transfer Regulation allows it under clear conditions. This guide turns them into a decision you can document.
The Personal Data Protection Law is Saudi Arabia's primary personal-data law. Official texts and implementing regulations are published by the competent authorities, including SDAIA.
A PDPL operating model assigns data inventories, owners, request workflows, processor controls, classification rules, and technical measures to daily operations.
No. The PDPL covers any processing of personal data of individuals in the Kingdom, including processing by entities outside Saudi Arabia. Where the company is incorporated does not decide it.
No. They share themes (inventory, rights, processors, security) but they are different legal regimes.
The Personal Data Protection Law came into force on 14 September 2023. It was issued by Royal Decree M/19 in 2021 and amended by Royal Decree M/148 in March 2023. Controllers had a one-year corrective period, during which SDAIA imposed no penalties, which ended on 14 September 2024. Since then the law and its Implementing Regulations are fully enforceable.
Administrative violations carry a warning or a fine up to SAR 5 million, and the fine can double for repeat violations, to a maximum of SAR 10 million. Disclosing or publishing sensitive data with intent to harm or for personal benefit carries up to two years in prison, a fine up to SAR 3 million, or both. Courts can also confiscate proceeds and order the ruling published.
You must notify SDAIA within 72 hours of becoming aware of a breach that causes or could cause harm to personal data or to data subjects. The notice describes the incident, the people and records affected, the risks and the measures taken. If facts are missing, send them as soon as possible with reasons. Affected individuals are notified without undue delay in simple language.
The Implementing Regulations require a DPO in three cases: a public entity that processes personal data on a large scale, a controller whose core activities require regular, continuous monitoring of individuals, and a controller whose core activities involve sensitive data. The DPO can be an employee or an external contractor. SDAIA has also issued rules on the appointment itself.
Controllers must respond within 30 days. The deadline can be extended by up to 30 more days when the request needs unusual effort or many requests arrive together, provided the data subject is told in advance with the reason. The same clock covers requests to access, copy, correct or destroy personal data.
Controllers must register in the National Register of Controllers on the platform if they are a public entity, if processing personal data is their main activity, or if they process sensitive data. Private entities name a delegate who completes the registration. Registered controllers receive a certificate and renew it before it expires. The same platform is used for breach notifications.
Yes, under the PDPL and the Regulation on Personal Data Transfer outside the Kingdom. The transfer must not harm national security, must go to an adequate destination or rely on safeguards such as SDAIA's standard contractual clauses or binding common rules, and must be limited to the minimum data. A risk assessment is required when using safeguards or sending sensitive data abroad continuously or at scale.
PDPL makes consent the default basis and bars legitimate interest for sensitive data. It adds criminal penalties for disclosing sensitive data, caps fines at SAR 5 million (doubling for repeat violations) instead of a share of turnover, requires registration with SDAIA, and has its own transfer clauses and risk assessments. Both set a 72-hour breach deadline and about a month to answer requests, but PDPL allows only one 30-day extension where GDPR allows two more months.
Tell us which system, control, or requirement you are working on. We’ll come back with a clear next step.